(June 14, 2009 at 4:28 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:(June 13, 2009 at 6:14 pm)bozo Wrote:(June 13, 2009 at 6:01 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: An admission therefore that you cannot deal with the point raised ... suits me!
You are so predictable and borish.
The word is "boorish" and I just love the fact that you are unable to deal with the point raised.
Kyu
(June 14, 2009 at 1:25 am)Samson Wrote: So it's ok for us to put down an "Animal" when it gets out of control, but we can't put down a human that has became an animal when they do..........Yeah, makes perfect sense...Bottom line is, a human that has became a savage beast (Animal) has lost their right to be a human in society. They have lost their humanity, and should be treated as an animal.
Er ... where did I something that supported the view you appear to be attacking?
Kyu
Having said I wouldn't continue, you force me into it. I dealt with red man killing red man ( as per your assertion ) and claim that is totally different to what happened to the indigenous tribes at the hands of the whites. Got it now?
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
