(January 19, 2021 at 1:55 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I have no interest in any dispute over what church, if any, has any authority or the right set of doctrines.
I was pointing out that your explanation for how trinitarianism made sense, was that trinitarianism was wrong. That this was an anti-trinitarian belief ..and wondering whether you were aware.
again right or wrong makes no difference as trinitiarism as you represent it in a doctrinal form is not once presented in the bible. meaning the doctrine of trinitarism is not taught scripturally. it is a doctrine of the church and as such is not subject to or protected under the umbrella of infallibility biblical doctrine is..
So again, so what if my explanation does not coincide with the religious doctrine of trinitarism? these are church/religious appologetics and not religious/god breathed scripture. which is why i might suggest the premise is based on an illogical paradox some 3 century priest tried to figure out based on the info he had.
