Some people are pushing the lab theory. It isn't impossible, but I still think it is unlikely. The genetic modifications to the virus, compared to wild strains look to be random small defects, not engineered sections. So, it wasn't genetically engineered. It got its extra function from generational mutation. Some claim that this can be done artificially and deliberately, but I fail to see the likelihood, given that nature has all the tools to generate this (and why would anyone do that?)
Yes, it could've been an accidental lab release, but then one would have to prove the lab had this virus. Experts who set up the lab, and now visited the lab, say that lab protocols make this accidental release of anything unlikely. Take that as you will.
So, the lab idea isn't impossible, but unlikely. We also don't have evidence of a precursor virus in other animals with most of these mutations. So, we don't know a history of the mutations. That is great fodder for conspiracy theorists. I just see natural cause as being more likely, though who am I to judge? Most experts say this, so I'll go with their assessment for now.
Having said that, the WHO statements do seem a bit political.
Yes, it could've been an accidental lab release, but then one would have to prove the lab had this virus. Experts who set up the lab, and now visited the lab, say that lab protocols make this accidental release of anything unlikely. Take that as you will.
So, the lab idea isn't impossible, but unlikely. We also don't have evidence of a precursor virus in other animals with most of these mutations. So, we don't know a history of the mutations. That is great fodder for conspiracy theorists. I just see natural cause as being more likely, though who am I to judge? Most experts say this, so I'll go with their assessment for now.
Having said that, the WHO statements do seem a bit political.
