(February 18, 2021 at 5:57 pm)Ranjr Wrote:(February 18, 2021 at 5:21 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: They are both only "economical" when subsidized by tax dollars.
Wind power has been around for centuries.
If it was more economical than other sources of energy it would have replaced steam power in the 19th century.
You're comparing a source of electricity to a source of mechanical force, while ignoring the facts of the day. Nattering naybob.
Bullshit.
You are ignoring the economic realities. EVERY "successful green power source" is heavily subsidized by taxpayers.. They are not economically on par with other sources.
Period.