The Official 'Damned Cruz' Thread

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Do you suppose that it's generally okay to just drop part of the name of a place?

Colorado, TX doesn't exist.  Colorado City, TX does.

We don't say Moines or Francisco.  There isn't a far NE state named Hampshire and the North and South is sort of important in designating which Carolina or Dakota you are talking about.

I understand that you play fast and loose with the language - in fact, I usually except that about you.

1.If I say, New York, New York no one is confused about the place I'm talking about. 

2.Yes it does there is a place in Texas named Colorado which has a mayor. 

3.If I said, Francisco California no one would doubt what city I'm referring to. If I said  Moines Iowa no one would doubt what city I'm referring to. You could cut the New in New Hampshire as long as you mention it's a state. You can skip North and South by simply referring to them as Dakota's or Carolina's

4. I'm fast and loose, I'm simply not redundant.

If you were to write a letter to someone in Fargo, would you address it ‘Fargo, Dakota’?

Boru