Why did Jesus suffer for sinners and not victims

[The Architect Of Fate]

It's sad and interesting how many justifications that can be made for killing what is obviously a baby.

Nope, it's inspiring to see how many respect bodily autonomy and reject its obvious violation and sad to see how many embrace tyranny in the name of faith.

With callous disregard, sarcasm ...and a straight face! 

With reasonable detachment as oppose to unhinged emotionalism and zealous hunger for control.

That baby on the "table"?? Who could just watch it die? There is no Christian I know that wouldn't 

You have yet to prove that statement is in context. Plenty of  Christians are fine children dying.

take that baby home and love it! And, to try and feel good about yourselves, by saying we wouldn't 

I never said that, And their plenty of Christians who would snark "let the parent take care of it. It's none of my business"

is not only patently false but diabolically perverse! I know many, many good people whose houses
are filled with "unwanted" children! And of every race!

And there are even more whose houses are not despite their protests.

I can't find one atheist among them!

Plenty of Atheists adopt despite the unfair obstacles and blatant prejudice they face in trying. So this attempts to make theists seem like saints and atheists as devils fail.

IF "your" abortion was unconditionally constitutional, which it isn't technically.... states would not be able to
stop it, and restrict abortion. As many now are doing with the "Heartbeat bill".

It should be unconditional and the heartbeat bill is a travesty. It's solidly legal as it needs to be the states are simply undermining the law and reason.

The reason? The Pro abortion advocates do not want to open a can of wormy truth. And "possibly"
lose ALL access to abortion through Roe being overturned.

There is no Pro-Abortion there is only Pro-Choice. No, they don't want to open because the matter is settled and there is no reason to. Roe isn't going anywhere. The only people who want to open it are religious zealots who are obsessed with control and feelings.

The question again... that would be before the Supreme court: "Is the fetus a baby, with rights?"

Nope, the court will rule that the Fetuses rights if it has any don't extend to living someone's body against their will. Because that is the only rational answer.

And of course we all know the answer. 

Yes we do I have written it above 

Your god of science, is ironically proving The God more & more!

There is no "god of science" and science never proves your mystic nonsense it only refutes it.


Again your delusional prattle makes you look like a total nob.

---

If I had to choose between the one actively participating on the ground, and the one who sits back watching edited videos with music for dramatic effect, I'm inclined to pick the one watching videos as most likely to be deluded. Wouldn't you agree?

I mentioned the availability heuristic earlier. I think we now know the cause of that—documentaries. They are availability factories. They search for the most salient moments, the loudest speakers, the most persuasive angles, and present them on a platter for you. They distort reality in such a way that you'd be better off considering them only as entertainment.

So no real counter then.