RE: The reason religion is so powerful
June 8, 2021 at 1:18 pm
(This post was last modified: June 8, 2021 at 1:20 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:There is a shift from the logic-based approach of Nagel's argument, to an affect-based approach in Fake Messiah's scenario. For example, perhaps we are evolutionarily wired to value the survival of babies in ways that we are not for the survival of zygoteNope the scenario remains the same and yes it does address it
Given that he is questioning the logic of the Nagel argument, his formulation doesn't quite address that.
(June 8, 2021 at 12:23 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:(June 8, 2021 at 11:09 am)John 6IX Breezy Wrote: I think the reason we would choose an infant over an elderly person (and you hinted at something similar) has something to do with Thomas Nagel's famous argument: Death is evil insofar as it deprives us of life. Therefore, the younger you are the more life you can be deprived of, and the more tragic the death. And abortion, I would argue, logically deprives an organism of the most life possible.
So that means that you would rather save ten frozen fertilized eggs than one baby or one older person from the fire.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM