RE: Why God doesn't stop satan?
June 11, 2021 at 1:05 am
(This post was last modified: June 11, 2021 at 1:08 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
(June 11, 2021 at 12:49 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote:Klor never misses a chance to dodge the burden of proof. You have to kind of admire his dedication to its avoidance.(June 10, 2021 at 5:08 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: Nobody here is denying that the existence of other minds is mundane... I am not a solipsist to deny that. But other minds are still referred to in philosophy as a problem.. why, in your opinion..?
Exactly so, and, to the existence of other minds, your belief in a great fairy is no more relevant or useful to that end. Theism is not a solution to the problem of hard solipsism that you see as a problem. It's a full throated invocation of it's truth.
I insist, for example, that I only need observe other human existence to believe in other minds. You assert, to the contrary, that those humans have no proper mind and indeed no free will. That all is the mind of god, all is the will of god - not the will of any or even all men.
You, Kloro, are arguing with yourself and your own god - not me...or any other atheist.
Quote:Nobody here in this forum managed to give a clear definition of design without begging their position. Contrasting nature with machines already begs the claim that nature is undesigned. This is something that one finds a lot in atheist literature. And it's enough for me to declare that they give dishonest definitions to things to short-circuit our arguments.
Atheists don't believe in a designer, therefore they think aspects of design we see around us are not sufficient... but aspects of things that look like people do point to other minds, you even called this mundane; why shouldn't the existence of a designer be mundane too, for the same reason??
No one here has to...... aside from you, as you're the only one who asserts that this particular design is real and true and demonstrable. Obvious, no less, as your batshit assertions about the atheist position and their criteria engenders. I'd say I'd wait for you to do so, but I know that you're incapable, because I know that what you believe...not only by my own metrics, but by your own, is simply untrue and cannot be true.
Atheists, Kloro......don't believe in gods. Atheists can and do believe in designs, which are certainly a real thing, which really exists. As other posters have noted, you believe things about yourself and the world and gods that cannot be concurrently true - and yet, you do believe them. I have no interest in litigating the truth of any given article of your belief, and see no reason to do so. I merely meant to point out that if you believe that atheists are wrong because they believe things that are wrong by their own standards as you see them....well, you've just indicted yourself on the same grounds.
You do not believe in free will, and yet you insist upon it's reality.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM