(November 9, 2011 at 3:45 pm)Godschild Wrote: Not true creationist do support Pangea. Genetic disorders were far less then, the gene pool was rather pure.
Didn't think many creationists would, because it would mean accepting that the earth is a lot older than 6 or 10 thousand years. I guess some may.
Also the genetic thing, would be nice to see you back that assertion up. What is fact is that when there is inbreeding, there are genetic disorders and it's fatal. The species cannot survive on inbred offspring. The whole "cleaner gene pool, or DNA hadn't been invented yet' is just silly little excuses, a desperate attempt to sustain a faulty belief. Inbreeding is fatal to the species! If we all had sex with our bothers and sisters, our offspring will have all kinds of health problems, many fatal. Heart problems, organ failer and the like. There's a long list of side effects.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
