(June 25, 2021 at 3:30 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: And your rejection of non-empirical evidence (inferential arguments, deductive arguments, analogical arguments, etc.) is a sheer display of your dishonesty towards the religious case.
Dishonesty? There is nothing dishonest about recognizing that from a very, very early age the "religious case" has always registered in my mind as fiction. I owe it no more respect than I owe to a comic book.
Quote:You didn't say that verbatim -of course, I just mentioned the underlying assumption you're too cowardly to tell us more about...
Thank you for acknowledging that you did in fact lie about what I said.
As for your libel against my character, that says far more about you than me -- and says even more about how worthless your beliefs are.