Why does science always upstage God?

[Ahriman]

The saints proof has two flaws.  First, it's circular.  It assumes that the feats of the saints stem from God and therefore are evidence of God.  But you don't know that their feats stem from God so it isn't evidence of God.  The second is statistical.  There are always going to be exceptional people.  That's an artifact of random distribution.  You're arguing their exceptionalism requires an explanation beyond random chance when you haven't shown that it does.

How do you figure? Random distribution? What even is that?