Why does science always upstage God?

[Angrboda]

The saints proof has two flaws.  First, it's circular.  It assumes that the feats of the saints stem from God and therefore are evidence of God.  But you don't know that their feats stem from God so it isn't evidence of God.  The second is statistical.  There are always going to be exceptional people.  That's an artifact of random distribution.  You're arguing their exceptionalism requires an explanation beyond random chance when you haven't shown that it does.

These saints say their feats stem from God, and I believe them.

I have seen this in others and experienced it myself.   When you do things in God's service,  you get a super-human energy and commitment level.  You do things that seem impossible.

This is why 80-year-old nuns of the Sisters of Charity can do backbreaking work of caring for the poor all day every day.

Yeah, so? It still doesn't show that these feats come from God. You believing their claims and their claims themselves are evidence of nothing.

---

The saints proof has two flaws.  First, it's circular.  It assumes that the feats of the saints stem from God and therefore are evidence of God.  But you don't know that their feats stem from God so it isn't evidence of God.  The second is statistical.  There are always going to be exceptional people.  That's an artifact of random distribution.  You're arguing their exceptionalism requires an explanation beyond random chance when you haven't shown that it does.

How do you figure? Random distribution? What even is that?