RE: Atheism: The True Path?
June 20, 2009 at 5:24 am
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2009 at 5:27 am by fr0d0.)
Have any bearing on what matter Evie? The matter of scientific proof = none. The matter of theological logic = everything. For theology involving faith there has to be no evidence.
You're stuck in a confusing limbo trying to apply a method of reasoning to a subject in which that reasoning fails.
Empirical evidence of God is in everything around us. The entire universe/ multiverse. There's just no way of connecting the evidence to God or not.
Belief is dependent on faith. Belief is the step into accepting an alternative take on life. It's the attraction of that alternative lifestyle that is the main reason people believe on faith. God's actual existence being not provable is integral to all that. Your scientific interest in proofs one way or the other are entirely irrelevant to theology. To science, as everyone and their cat keeps saying, it's a nonsense. These things we know.
Now tell me infinite more times that there's no evidence and why anyway choose one over the other. You never actually say why you have problems with my answers, you only repeat blindly the questions, insisting on evidence. That's got to be the definition of stupidity.
You're stuck in a confusing limbo trying to apply a method of reasoning to a subject in which that reasoning fails.
Empirical evidence of God is in everything around us. The entire universe/ multiverse. There's just no way of connecting the evidence to God or not.
Belief is dependent on faith. Belief is the step into accepting an alternative take on life. It's the attraction of that alternative lifestyle that is the main reason people believe on faith. God's actual existence being not provable is integral to all that. Your scientific interest in proofs one way or the other are entirely irrelevant to theology. To science, as everyone and their cat keeps saying, it's a nonsense. These things we know.
Now tell me infinite more times that there's no evidence and why anyway choose one over the other. You never actually say why you have problems with my answers, you only repeat blindly the questions, insisting on evidence. That's got to be the definition of stupidity.
