Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 5:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
#36
RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it
(October 3, 2021 at 8:59 pm)Ghetto Sheldon Wrote:
(October 3, 2021 at 8:24 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: I thought there was a rule that said if you are going to talk about cognitive science, you can't be a dumbass who doesn't understand cognitive science. But (looking over the rules) I couldn't find it.

Maybe it should be a rule. And that's why I thought it was one.

^^  Dodging  
Im  a licensed dementia therapist 
Regardless of what I am personally,  there are mountains of evidence behind my scope of practice
If my relevant credentials aren't standing on their own,  
then whatever a responder says is only dodging 
A dodger's next step is to get a consult w/ another  clinician

The requirements for licensure as a dementia therapist, though they may vary from state to state, are no joke. Years of experience in a medical field, and a four year degree (in anything). You also have to attend a seminar. Not sure how long the seminar is. Could be one day. Could be 500 hours. That's all fine and good. And I'm sure you are qualified to practice your profession.

But this qualification doesn't necessarily translate to an expertise in cognitive science. You are likely only required to learn the bits of cognitive psychology that pertain to your practice, with (I'm sure) some more general instruction also heaped on.

A masters degree in cognitive science or psychology would do more to suggest expertise. And even THEN... in a hypothetical world where you had a masters degree in cog psy... you've still only made statements of authority up to this point. Something tells me if you actually had a master's degree, you'd not do that. You'd say [this idea] is wrong because of x (which is empirically supported in cognitive studies). You have provided less than a teaspoonful of substance in all your posts combined.

So-- no-- you're relevant credentials are not standing on their own. And even if you had relevant credentials, you're not properly engaging in argument. That's something you'd learn in grad school... how to argue an original thesis using a proper methodology.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The atrocities of religiosity warrant our finest. Logic is not it - by vulcanlogician - October 4, 2021 at 9:51 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  It's Darwin Day tomorrow - logic and reason demands merriment! Duty 7 953 February 13, 2022 at 10:21 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  How to calmly decline religiosity from religious associates NeedForSpeed 0 328 July 13, 2020 at 10:42 am
Last Post: NeedForSpeed
  First order logic, set theory and God dr0n3 293 35900 December 11, 2018 at 11:35 am
Last Post: T0 Th3 M4X
Tongue Disproving Odin - An Experiment in arguing with a theist with Theist logic Cecelia 983 180869 June 6, 2018 at 2:11 pm
Last Post: Raven Orlock
  a challenge All atheists There is inevitably a Creator. Logic says that suni_muslim 65 16984 November 28, 2017 at 5:02 pm
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut
  What is logic? Little Rik 278 64704 May 1, 2017 at 5:40 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  What is your Opinion on Having Required Classes in Logic in Schools? Salacious B. Crumb 43 10212 August 4, 2015 at 12:01 am
Last Post: BitchinHitchins
  Logic vs Evidence dimaniac 34 13977 November 25, 2014 at 10:41 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Examples of the atrocities caused by non Muslims WinterHold 64 9920 July 30, 2014 at 12:44 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
Exclamation The Ill-Logic, it Burns Bob Kelso 7 2871 April 1, 2014 at 12:47 am
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 53 Guest(s)