RE: Noteworthy News
October 17, 2021 at 5:33 pm
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2021 at 5:33 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(October 17, 2021 at 5:21 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(October 17, 2021 at 5:04 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Given that no one could possibly have been killed by gunfire at Agingcourt because there WERE no guns at Agingcourt, thought my meaning was pretty plain. But no need to defend yourself - OLB seems to have missed the sarcasm, too.Absolutely. I' m glad you understand.
No weapon is more ‘deadly’ than another. The deadliness of any weapon is situational.
Boru
This is what makes high capacity magazine bans ludicrous.
How deadly ANY weapon is determined by only one factor - the skill of the user.
And yeah - I get sarcasm
I speak it fluently.
Actually, the deadliness of a weapon is determined by more than the skill of the user. This is why a slingshot expert is less deadly than a moderately proficient rifleman on an elephant hunt.
To return to our muttons, though, it seems pretty clear that guns cause more deaths than bows and arrows, if only because guns are more prevalent.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
