Oh, I guess it depends how liberal.
But by "liberal" I guess that usually means that they are more open to science, although they are equally obnoxious.
For example, I once read parts of that physician-geneticist, Francis Collins, book about God, and he is using the same tired non-evidence for the existence of God. I stopped reading when he used the incident of his daughter's rape in a chapter where he wrote how God is not stopping evil because he wants to teach us a lesson.
It seems they are not very far from being fundies.
But by "liberal" I guess that usually means that they are more open to science, although they are equally obnoxious.
For example, I once read parts of that physician-geneticist, Francis Collins, book about God, and he is using the same tired non-evidence for the existence of God. I stopped reading when he used the incident of his daughter's rape in a chapter where he wrote how God is not stopping evil because he wants to teach us a lesson.
It seems they are not very far from being fundies.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
