(November 18, 2011 at 4:56 pm)paintpooper Wrote: I think we are still doing things 1800's style, but we have 2000's technology. That is a fundamental problem.
Communication
Computers
Why do we need a ruling class, we are all connected. Free ideas can flow, instant communication.
Why can't I vote on bills on my smart phone?
Why do we still work 8 hours a day, I'm sure 8 hours a day in 1900 was way less productive then 2000. So if we increase efficiency we just work the same to generate more product? Why not increase human leisure time.
The fundamental problem is the same today as it was in the 19th century i.e. the capitalist system ensuring the wealth and power possessed by the few whilst the many are exploited. The ruling class is not interested in giving up its privilege. Never has, never will.
Contemporary technology is always be used by the ruling class to protect its interest. You can't just wish away the ruling class, it exists.
Extending leisure time to the working class is low on the list of priorities for the exploiting class. Profit is the priority, the workers the means of achieving it.
Capitalism is in crisis around the world, so don't expect the bosses to have enlightened policies like working less hours on their agenda.
I grew up in the 1960's and I was greatly impressed by predictions that due to technology, when I reached working age I would not be worrying about how long I spend at work, rather considering how I would spend the extra leisure time technological advances would afford me. That never happened in times far better than now, so don't expect anything other than struggle today.
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
