(November 16, 2011 at 6:53 pm)MrGuitar Wrote: As some genuine intellectuals have already stated in the topic, this pyramid is actually not of capitalism, but of the mankind himself.

In fact, this pyramyd is a realistic and descriptive animation of the human nature, and no doubt, will have the same hiearchy, ever...

Excuse me? "geniune intellectuals"?

Do I know you? Surely that sounded like you were trying to say that those who agree with this picture are not intellectual.

that is fallacy number one and rather insulting.

Character attack and strawman.
---

Number two, your suggestion that this picture is "human nature" is demonstrably false, as many societies throughout human history have existed WITHOUT the structure shown in this picture. The first to come to mind is many Native American tribes.

Because you called this picture "human nature" you have defacto labeled all societites, past and present, who have lived without this unnecesary structure as "non-human"

This is fallacy number 2

Demonizing and yet more strawman tactics.

---
Number three. This picture is not an "animation". animation is moving pictures designed to create the illusion of motion. this is merely a "drawing".
---
Your final falacy is that humans will have the same heirarchy forever. What about military societies? What about monastic societies like we see in budhist majorities? Nomadic societies surely dont follow this process as well? Are they not human? Or are they not following what you consider to be human nature?

(November 16, 2011 at 6:53 pm)MrGuitar Wrote: As some genuine intellectuals have already stated in the topic, this pyramid is actually not of capitalism, but of the mankind himself.

In fact, this pyramyd is a realistic and descriptive animation of the human nature, and no doubt, will have the same hiearchy, ever...

A genuine intellectual? What the fuck is that? Pretty condescending from a new guy. Especially a wrong new guy.

So tell me: are you trolling or just stupid enough to insult the intelligence of someone for disagreeing with you?

(November 17, 2011 at 11:17 am)Vaeolet Lilly Blossom Wrote:

(November 16, 2011 at 6:53 pm)MrGuitar Wrote: As some genuine intellectuals have already stated in the topic, this pyramid is actually not of capitalism, but of the mankind himself.

In fact, this pyramyd is a realistic and descriptive animation of the human nature, and no doubt, will have the same hiearchy, ever...

A genuine intellectual? What the fuck is that? Pretty condescending from a new guy. Especially a wrong new guy.

So tell me: are you trolling or just stupid enough to insult the intelligence of someone for disagreeing with you?

Fuck yourself u poor idiot!

(November 17, 2011 at 4:21 pm)MrGuitar Wrote: Fuck yourself u poor idiot!

No, i'll have my girlfriend fuck me, and I'm rich, and if I'm an idiot: you have the intellectual capacity of a manure-coated shovel.

(November 17, 2011 at 4:21 pm)MrGuitar Wrote: Fuck yourself u poor idiot!

Translation: "I can no longer defend my poorly thought out argument."

(November 17, 2011 at 5:37 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote:

(November 17, 2011 at 4:21 pm)MrGuitar Wrote: Fuck yourself u poor idiot!

Translation: "I can not longer defend my poorly unthought out argument."

It went straight from up the ass and into the mouth.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/35...your-mouth

Wow, this guy is an asswank.

(November 18, 2011 at 12:07 am)frankiej Wrote: Wow, this guy is an asswank.

Still waiting for his response

Until then, please, everyone enjoy the discussion and ask questions

I think we are still doing things 1800's style, but we have 2000's technology. That is a fundamental problem.

Communication
Computers

Why do we need a ruling class, we are all connected. Free ideas can flow, instant communication.
Why can't I vote on bills on my smart phone?
Why do we still work 8 hours a day, I'm sure 8 hours a day in 1900 was way less productive then 2000. So if we increase efficiency we just work the same to generate more product? Why not increase human leisure time.

(November 18, 2011 at 4:56 pm)paintpooper Wrote: I think we are still doing things 1800's style, but we have 2000's technology. That is a fundamental problem.

Communication
Computers

Why do we need a ruling class, we are all connected. Free ideas can flow, instant communication.
Why can't I vote on bills on my smart phone?
Why do we still work 8 hours a day, I'm sure 8 hours a day in 1900 was way less productive then 2000. So if we increase efficiency we just work the same to generate more product? Why not increase human leisure time.

I agree with all of your questions, and you dont have to be a leftist or socialist type to recognize that these are legitimate questions.