(December 1, 2021 at 4:00 pm)Ranjr Wrote: Should a theist propose a god whom science does not rule out, I would listen. That means, a god who didn't exist before the universe or create it. One who doesn't know everything, will things to happen, or defy natural laws. That god would at least have a chance to exist.
Right? At the core, my whole argument is that "god" is inherently set up as "something that cannot exist" because as soon as it does, it no longer fits the mystical requirements of the definition.
If a theist brought you a guy named Dave(who fits your criteria) and said "this is god" it'd be like, "well, they got me there. Dave exists."
