RE: Atheism: The True Path?
June 22, 2009 at 3:55 pm
(This post was last modified: June 22, 2009 at 4:00 pm by fr0d0.)
Interesting result Leo but hardly authoritative. Not that I dismiss the postings, just that I know through serious study that the NIV is the most accurate. Yes I'd always agree about cross reading versions. Every Christian I know does that. There's also continual discoveries of meanings from the original to throw light on any translation. Most sermons on the bible I've been to contain this element.
(June 22, 2009 at 3:33 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: To be fair Kyu--unless I'm missing something here (either on your side or fr0d0's side)--isn't that what fr0d0 has been saying all along? That God is unreachable by science? That's how he defines God? Science can't reach God because the God fr0d0 believes in is defined to be unfalsifiable and unprovable. So whatever 'reasons' he has for believing they aren't scientific...right fr0d0?...Exactly right Evie
(June 22, 2009 at 3:33 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: ...The thing is though fr0d0: I am just having trouble understanding what those reasons are and/or how they are at all valid to whether your God actually exists or not. That's the problem I have with your "Faith".No, my reasons are not valid as to whether my God exists or not. That (existence) is completely down to faith. To not knowing.
EvF
