Quote:Well, they say this new policy will result in less injuries to police and suspects. I have no problem accepting that, because less interaction is obviously going to lead to less injuries for both parties. Makes complete sense and I don't even need to look at any studies to see that. The job of the police is to protect the citizenry at large though, and their well-being, and I'm not sure this new policy does that by letting thousands of criminals speed walk away. I'll look more into their studies when I get a chance, and I'll plead ignorance here to an extent, but on the face of it, this policy doesn't make sense to me. If the only goal is to prevent injuries to officers and suspects? Sure. Telling people in advance that they can get away with any number of crimes scott free if they just speed walk away? Could embolden some people to go commit those crimes. Why not commit crime if there is no consequence for it?
Holy hell this is embarrassing...

"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM