RE: Do you think that without religion the crusades would have never happened?
June 25, 2009 at 2:54 pm
(June 25, 2009 at 2:01 pm)g-mark Wrote:Quote:Math and philosophy are not the same thing.
Get your facts right. Mathematics was once a philosophy. Every science was once a philosophy. Now your a moderator has that elevated you to 'know it all'. Looks as if it has. Should I bow now. Your jugements show evidence of your true character.
Show me your scientific/researched evidence that Philosophy and Maths are not the same thing. Your opinion will not suffice.
Quote:phi⋅los⋅o⋅phy
/fɪˈlɒsəfi/ Show Spelled [fi-los-uh-fee] Show IPA
Use philosophy in a Sentence
–noun, plural -phies.
1.the rational investigation of the truths and principles of being, knowledge, or conduct.
2.any of the three branches, namely natural philosophy, moral philosophy, and metaphysical philosophy, that are accepted as composing this study.
3.a system of philosophical doctrine: the philosophy of Spinoza.
4.the critical study of the basic principles and concepts of a particular branch of knowledge, esp. with a view to improving or reconstituting them: the philosophy of science.
5.a system of principles for guidance in practical affairs.
6.a philosophical attitude, as one of composure and calm in the presence of troubles or annoyances.
math⋅e⋅mat⋅ics
/ˌmæθəˈmætɪks/ Show Spelled [math-uh-mat-iks] Show IPA
Use mathematics in a Sentence
–noun
1.(used with a singular verb) the systematic treatment of magnitude, relationships between figures and forms, and relations between quantities expressed symbolically.
2.(used with a singular or plural verb) mathematical procedures, operations, or properties.
Hmmm, they suspiciously look like not the same thing.
Proving a negative as a mathematical equation is a concept of numbers. Proving a negative in philosophy is a concept truth. Saying that they are the same because one was rooted in the other is silly.
The concept that you can't prove a negative is about proving that something doesn't exist, not a negative quantity. That's a big difference. Whether you can or cannot prove a negative statement is debatable. And yes, a math problem is a statement, but with two different meanings. Like the difference between a regular theory and a scientific theory, there is a difference in a philosophical statement and a mathematical statement.
And no, I don't claim to know it all. Never have, never will. Moderator or not I still would have pointed out the fallacy in the statement you made. So please, try to argue based on facts and not make baseless accusations that has nothing to do with the argument at hand. Ad hominems get you nowhere.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :
odcast:: Boston Atheists Report
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :
odcast:: Boston Atheists Report

