Ron Paul ignored.

[reverendjeremiah]

Both of you guys need links to back up your statements.

Here is a site with all of the bills he signed
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/11/04/...-for-paul/

Time for the Ron Paul supporter to go nuts and claim they are all wrong.

---

Wouldn't have voted for civil rights in 1964?! BARF!

The Civil Rights Act was not meant to help anyone; it was meant to cause chaos, general anarchy. Besides, the act itself is 100% UnConstitutional. It does what the very act itself is opposed to: Gives people higher priority based on the amount of melanin in their skin.

You dont even know what the word Anarchy means, nor did you even use it in context.

You replaced the word "disorder" with Anarchy, thereby "Ron Pauling" the word "Anarchism"

P.S. - Notice how I used "Ron Paul" in place of "Demonizing"? Well, thats what you did to the word "Anarchy". If you want to be taken serious, then you should know that words actually have meaning. Anarchy means "without rulers". Thats it. It does not mean "Mob rule on the streets looting and pilaging"

---

As far as I am aware, Ron Paul's reason for not voting for the civil rights act, is because rights aren't things that can be voted on. Rights are rights; end of story. If you have to vote for rights, then you undermine what rights actually are.

Not voting for the civil rights act is not the same as "not supporting rights". You can support the rights of people without having to vote for them; indeed, because voting for them means they aren't rights in the first place.

Yet he's all for allowing the states to vote on the RIGHT of a womans womb to do with as she pleases or not.

Do you not see the hypocrisy in this?

I can.