(September 4, 2022 at 4:16 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(September 4, 2022 at 1:57 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Yes, me and the rest of the entire world are willing to let Russia indiscriminately bomb cities. If my choices are that or possible WWIII, one is the lesser of two evils and far less people die in that scenario. I'll take millions of less deaths if those are my options.
Weren't you the one complaining that America is using Ukrainians to further its aims?
And now here you are, suggesting that you find it appropriate to sacrifice Ukrainians to further your own asserted aims. You clearly don't have much logical coherence.
My own asserted aims to not get sucked into WWIII? Doesn't every rational person on the planet want to avoid a third world war if possible? Isn't that why not one European government, or the American government, is willing to risk a no-fly zone, which is a massively neo-con position? I am not morally responsible for what happens to Ukrainians because Russia is the one killing them, not me. If I say I want to stay out of it, I am not morally responsible for what someone else chooses to do. If I said I supported giving Ukraine billions in weapons, THEN I would be in part responsible for the deaths, because I'm arguing for the artificial prolonging of the war and rising piles of bodies. That's a totally different story.