(October 16, 2022 at 4:45 am)Peebothuhlu Wrote: Okay... that clears up a few things for me.
I'm of the opinion it's wrong for ANY country to invade ANY WHERE.
So Haiti's troubles has nothing to do with the troubles in Europe, got ya.![]()
Not at work.
Again: it’s a different subject. But invade Haiti today and 20 years later all you will get will be an Afghanistan 2.0.
There are some elements that are simply lacking in today’s international policies. We don’t seem to have accurate methods for supporting countries (like Haiti for instance) who are truly in big trouble. By this I mean supporting them without giving them money, loans or food. There are countries in Central America who are ruled by local cartels and the local population has no option but to flee toward north-America or Mexico.
Today we have no mean of supporting such countries. It isn’t there. Bu the U.N. could support the rule of a fairly elected government. That help this government to assert its power over the marauding gangs by helping their army, their justice system, their police force with inspectors, people who are closely monitoring these efforts, training programs for such police forces etc. (like what the U.S. seemingly tried to do in Afghanistan but seems to have failed entirely).