RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
December 4, 2011 at 11:50 am
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2011 at 12:36 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Still don't see any evidence. All I see is a preacher frothing at the mouth, hot with christfire and self righteousness.
You don't see how anyone could have a conversation with a person who will not willingly suffer bullshit to even begin the discourse? That's probably the reason you have trouble having a conversation in the first place, and end up talking at people instead of with people. Neither myself nor anyone else has to give your fairy tales any credibility whatsoever to have a discussion about them. You don't just desire that we do, you require that we do, otherwise it's bullshit start to finish. Not just in actuality, but even in the hypothetical. A does not prove B unless you can first prove A. You aren't prepared to demonstrate the truth of any of your claims, let alone the foundation upon which they rest. So you suggest that we simply put the whole greasy cock of a claim directly down our throats, and complain that a conversation can't be had if we don't. Guess what, bullshit.
It isn't my blanket denial and skepticism of anything you claim that should bother you, it's your inability to overcome it that should give you reason for pause. If you can't establish the factual reality of your truth claims then what are they exactly? Bullshit.
(I wouldn't even assume this position if you didn't have a habit of posting junk "science" and deliberately misleading or downright deceitful quotes. If you appeared to be even remotely capable of having an honest discussion. You don't, and so here we are.)
You don't see how anyone could have a conversation with a person who will not willingly suffer bullshit to even begin the discourse? That's probably the reason you have trouble having a conversation in the first place, and end up talking at people instead of with people. Neither myself nor anyone else has to give your fairy tales any credibility whatsoever to have a discussion about them. You don't just desire that we do, you require that we do, otherwise it's bullshit start to finish. Not just in actuality, but even in the hypothetical. A does not prove B unless you can first prove A. You aren't prepared to demonstrate the truth of any of your claims, let alone the foundation upon which they rest. So you suggest that we simply put the whole greasy cock of a claim directly down our throats, and complain that a conversation can't be had if we don't. Guess what, bullshit.
It isn't my blanket denial and skepticism of anything you claim that should bother you, it's your inability to overcome it that should give you reason for pause. If you can't establish the factual reality of your truth claims then what are they exactly? Bullshit.
(I wouldn't even assume this position if you didn't have a habit of posting junk "science" and deliberately misleading or downright deceitful quotes. If you appeared to be even remotely capable of having an honest discussion. You don't, and so here we are.)
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
