Voluntary Human Extinction Movement

[Dmitry1983]

No, it's not. Based on scientific evidence most species benefit from warmer climate.

Yes, it is. Pointing to past climate conditions and applying it to now is not scientific and is a fallacy.

Denying scientific evidence is not scientific and is a fallacy.

Ignoring scientific evidence is antithetical to atheism.

I'm not. I'm ignoring your unfounded reasoning.

You are ignoring a scientific fact that life thrives in warmer climate.

but it is also a net positive for Northern countries and life on Earth in general.

Nope, and I already pointed out why and no it won't be. Despite your assertions.

It's not my assertions. Scientists claim that Northern countries will benefit from global warming.

You ignoring scientific evidence so you are science denier.

Except I'm not denying science. I'm rejecting your flawed reasoning 

You are rejecting scientific evidence.

Scientific fact

This refutes nothing 

It supports my claim that most species don't need to adapt quickly to changing climate.

they have minimal impact on habitability

No, they don't 

Yes they do

How does permafrost in Siberia affect other Northern countries?

Lol, are you seriously asking how Siberian permafrost affects the general north?.....

Yes, how does permafrost in Siberia make Canada less habitable?

It's common sense that more precipitation means less deserts and scientific evidence supports this claim.

Commonsense isn't a great determiner of much and no science does not support this claim at all.

Except it does
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_humid_period