The most disturbing image I saw in my life

[WinterHold]

I judge their claims as being "fabrications" and "nonsense" because I know exactly that these men were gathered in the council to serve the agenda of Rome; and that any of them attempting to defy the will of the Emperor Constantine would end up crossed on the Roman cross.

We have detailed documented chronicles of how Rome was governed in the period of Constantine.

As for your side; it is demolished by the definition of the council itself:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Coun...aea#Agenda

It's important to remember that a pronouncement by a biased person serving an agenda can still be true. If - for the purpose of argument - we take it as read that Jesus of Nazareth with an historic personage, the Council was perfectly correct in saying that he was 'begotten'.

Boru

The council agreed that Jesus is "begotten out of the essence of God":

1. While Arius argued that Jesus Christ was created out of nothing or out of something else, the council affirmed that he was begotten out of the substance (essence) of the Father.

   
   
   

BTW this is the base difference and rivalry between Islam & Constantine's Christianity: 

Islam = Jesus was created from human essence just like any other human.
Constantine Christianity= Jesus is a God-like with the essence of God flowing in his veins. Jesus = God, thus Jesus = the father; thus trinity.

That council was nothing but a heathen opinion of a heathen emperor -Constantine- that protected this blasphemy with Roman Centurions.