Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 9, 2026, 7:20 pm
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
Happy UnBeliever Offline
Newbie
*
Religious Views: Humanists
Posts: 55
Threads: 3
Joined: May 31, 2010
Reputation: 1
#6
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
December 7, 2011 at 7:42 pm
Using the gMark to prove jesus ....its the worst thing you could have done...that and using the bible to prove itself another fallacy often attempted and failed by jesus followers..
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.

Messages In This Thread
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 1:20 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:44 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 9:17 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 14, 2011 at 4:01 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 6, 2012 at 12:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Happy UnBeliever - December 7, 2011 at 7:42 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 8:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 19, 2011 at 7:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 26, 2011 at 2:57 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 8:14 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by ThomM - December 7, 2011 at 7:59 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by padraic - December 14, 2011 at 5:50 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 7:29 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Phil - January 23, 2012 at 10:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 24, 2012 at 12:27 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I literally cannot avoid sinning; so, why... zwanzig 70 18466 July 23, 2023 at 7:43 am
Last Post: no one
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 40584 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Question to theists: When to take the bible literally? T.J. 22 5623 November 26, 2021 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  They're going to be chanting to the wrong God. brewer 32 8029 March 17, 2021 at 2:39 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Exclamation Christianity is Dead, Long live the rEvolution! Bow Before Zeus 77 29089 December 26, 2017 at 2:59 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Cardinal Bernard Law dead at 86 KevinM1 14 4354 December 21, 2017 at 9:25 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Theism is literally childish I_am_not_mafia 391 139029 November 16, 2017 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  New Revised Standard Version Bible has Dead Sea Scroll input ?!?! vorlon13 17 6683 February 20, 2017 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement. Jehanne 155 56889 January 21, 2017 at 1:28 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Tim LaHaye is Dead! chimp3 29 7566 July 27, 2016 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)