Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 5, 2026, 4:13 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
#7
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
(December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm)Barre Wrote:
(December 7, 2011 at 1:28 am)Chuck Wrote: What's the point of agonizing over the correct interpretation of a particular word in a piece of an out and out lie that has been purposedly edited to suit multiple unmentionable purposes and been intentionally and unintentionally transcribed a hundred times?

There is no agonizing, only an attempt to interpret a biblical text.

You seem unwilling for some reason to study something that you regard as a lie.

Will you have this much enthusiasm when presented with a native american religion, or how about the Norse?

Are you this passionate about Thor as you are with Jesus?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 1:20 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by reverendjeremiah - December 7, 2011 at 7:42 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:44 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 9:17 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 14, 2011 at 4:01 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 6, 2012 at 12:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 8:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 19, 2011 at 7:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 26, 2011 at 2:57 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 8:14 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by ThomM - December 7, 2011 at 7:59 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by padraic - December 14, 2011 at 5:50 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 7:29 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Phil - January 23, 2012 at 10:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 24, 2012 at 12:27 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I literally cannot avoid sinning; so, why... zwanzig 70 19113 July 23, 2023 at 7:43 am
Last Post: no one
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 41983 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Question to theists: When to take the bible literally? T.J. 22 5850 November 26, 2021 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  They're going to be chanting to the wrong God. brewer 32 8275 March 17, 2021 at 2:39 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Exclamation Christianity is Dead, Long live the rEvolution! Bow Before Zeus 77 29775 December 26, 2017 at 2:59 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Cardinal Bernard Law dead at 86 KevinM1 14 4436 December 21, 2017 at 9:25 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Theism is literally childish I_am_not_mafia 391 142231 November 16, 2017 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  New Revised Standard Version Bible has Dead Sea Scroll input ?!?! vorlon13 17 6852 February 20, 2017 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement. Jehanne 155 58252 January 21, 2017 at 1:28 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Tim LaHaye is Dead! chimp3 29 7923 July 27, 2016 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)