Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 13, 2026, 8:41 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
#12
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally.
(December 7, 2011 at 7:42 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote:
(December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm)Barre Wrote:
(December 7, 2011 at 1:28 am)Chuck Wrote: What's the point of agonizing over the correct interpretation of a particular word in a piece of an out and out lie that has been purposedly edited to suit multiple unmentionable purposes and been intentionally and unintentionally transcribed a hundred times?

There is no agonizing, only an attempt to interpret a biblical text.

You seem unwilling for some reason to study something that you regard as a lie.

Will you have this much enthusiasm when presented with a native american religion, or how about the Norse?

Are you this passionate about Thor as you are with Jesus?

Do you think that I have correctly determined the nuance of Jesus' prediction about the appearance of the Messianic Age? If not, how would you render the text in question?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 1:20 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 7:44 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 9:17 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 14, 2011 at 4:01 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 6, 2012 at 12:38 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 8:57 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 19, 2011 at 7:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 26, 2011 at 2:57 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - December 7, 2011 at 8:14 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by ThomM - December 7, 2011 at 7:59 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by padraic - December 14, 2011 at 5:50 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 22, 2012 at 7:29 pm
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Phil - January 23, 2012 at 10:37 am
RE: The historical Jesus--dead wrong, literally. - by Barre - January 24, 2012 at 12:27 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  I literally cannot avoid sinning; so, why... zwanzig 70 18525 July 23, 2023 at 7:43 am
Last Post: no one
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 40866 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Question to theists: When to take the bible literally? T.J. 22 5632 November 26, 2021 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  They're going to be chanting to the wrong God. brewer 32 8033 March 17, 2021 at 2:39 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
Exclamation Christianity is Dead, Long live the rEvolution! Bow Before Zeus 77 29137 December 26, 2017 at 2:59 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Cardinal Bernard Law dead at 86 KevinM1 14 4360 December 21, 2017 at 9:25 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Theism is literally childish I_am_not_mafia 391 139622 November 16, 2017 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  New Revised Standard Version Bible has Dead Sea Scroll input ?!?! vorlon13 17 6686 February 20, 2017 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement. Jehanne 155 56945 January 21, 2017 at 1:28 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Tim LaHaye is Dead! chimp3 29 7640 July 27, 2016 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)