(February 17, 2023 at 5:31 pm)HappySkeptic Wrote: He found the use of the act as justifiable, but that it may not have been necessary had the situation been anticipated better by government and law enforcement. He also criticized the implementation of freezing assets of protestors.1. we don't if it would have been necessary or not nor does it matter really because when it was implemented it likely was.
2. Most of his criticisms of asset freezing were about there being no mechanism to unfreeze them. Not the act of freezing the assets themselves which he acknowledged worked.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
