(December 8, 2011 at 9:46 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: That’s really a shame, the more you learn about Darwinism the more absurd you realize it really is.
Only if you get your "information" from AIG
(December 8, 2011 at 9:46 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: God creating the light en route is actually not proposed much anymore, mainly for the reasons that Deist pointed out earlier. Most creationists won’t ascribe to C decay either. I believe currently there are five competing Cosmological models right now that can easily ge the light to Earth in 6,000 years or less, so it really is not much of an issue for Creationists anymore.
And not one of them worth pissing on
BTW, how's your ASC holding up? I have a refutation for that, in the very discovery that revealed that lightspeed was not infinite as previously thought.
(December 8, 2011 at 9:46 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: My problems with evolution are scientific in nature, not merely Theological.
No, they are theological only, we have yet to see any scientific basis for your bullshit.
(December 8, 2011 at 9:46 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Hope this helps!No.
SW
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
