(March 15, 2023 at 7:15 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(March 15, 2023 at 5:13 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Thump didn't question what the Israeli PM said. He and I are in agreement on that, so that's a you problem. Thump only argued that the Israeli PM wouldn't be privy to that kind of information, because he's Israeli and not British or American or Ukrainian. I, on the other hand, tend to think the former Israeli PM would be very much privy to that information if he wanted to know it.
Actually, that is rather questioning the veracity of what he said. I don't know one way or the other; I took you post at face value, but that still doesn't tell me if he's right or not.
So please don't misrepresent my point.
I didn't misinterpret you. You didn't question the translation of the Israeli PMs comments like Helios did, but rather, you simply said, the Israeli PM is not British or Ukrainian, so he wouldn't know and could be subject to a blind spot here, and the Israeli PM is just getting it wrong. Well, my contention is that Israeli PMs are in the know. And you don't even need to be a former world leader to be on the up and up and have this information that the public isn't privy to. Do you think Hillary Clinton, a non-former leader of a state, is not privy to information that the public isn't privy to concerning the scuttling of the peace deal? How naive are you? The elite know what's going on in the world. You were better off refusing to debate the point and just posting Christopher Hitchens quotes like you did before, because even though the man was wrong in that particular quote of his, he still does a far better job arguing his point than you did, so please, go back to posting Hitch quotes.
