Some Gays Can Go Straight, Study Says

[The Architect Of Fate]

Citation needed.  You think the PDF document is the actual training?  You’re funny.

I'm not referring to the pdf document. Try again 

Stop whining, you can read.  You provided one case, not impressed.

I think you’re getting me confused with the people on here condoning adult males showering with little girls.  

So you confuse whining with facts. That explains a lot  

Thank God you’re in the minority on this stuff.  Most people condemn child abuse, even if it’s committed by someone who says they’re trans.  

The good thing the thing in question isn't child abuse 

Women’s locker rooms were never intended to have biological males showering in them, hence the name, "Women's Locker Room".

The purpose of a looker room is so people can get dressed and store shit. The function is the same.

Males exposing themselves to little girls is sexual assault.  At least in America it is.

Not in a place where people are already supposed to be naked 

The fact it is child abuse is a good enough objection for me.  Again, remove God from morality and you end up with people condoning the murder of babies and sexual abuse of little girls.

Accept it's not child abuse. So this whole objection is moot 

Baseless assertion, citation needed.

Your objection is irrelevant and thus ignored 

Nope, I brought up pedophilia and your mind immediately thought I was talking about trans people, sounds like projection to me.

Nah you brought up pedophiles because you're trying to imply transpeople are pedophiles and you seem obsessed with the subject...Very particular  

I need a citation that in American law free speech is limited when dealing with preferred pronouns, especially if the use of said pronouns violates someone’s religious convictions.  Good luck.

America's free speech laws also contain limits so bringing this up is irrelevant 

I am apparently far more of a skeptic than you are.  Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.  Please provide your extraordinary evidence that transmen are actually men.  “They say so”, is not even evidence much less extraordinary evidence.  “I say so”, is even less evidence.  Real bush league. 

Actually, they say so is evidence. You simply don't like it, And no one cares 

I’ll need a citation proving that a majority of atheists possess something remotely resembling a shared ethos and then a citation demonstrating that a majority of them agree with you.  Not just white atheists either, worldwide here.  

What you need in this instance is something i don't need to care about 

That’s because an adult biological male exposing themself to a minor is SEXUAL assault.  You’re the one condoning child abuse, not me.  Apparently, you think it’s ok to sexually assault a child as long as it’s in the shower or something.  Gross stuff.

It's sexual assault or abuse so this whole statement collapses on itself 

Very scientific of you, and an anorexic is really obese because they tell you they are?  A person’s beliefs and feelings have no bearing on their ontology, that’s basic rationality.  

False comparison and another nonsequitur and you might brush up on your epistemology 

One example of sexual assault is too many isn’t it? I’ll provide more when you follow your own rules and start providing citations for your claims above.  Fair is fair.  

One example of a biological man in a women's space is nothing. You don't have any more or you would already present it. Lastly, i don't demand from you. 

Nah, just expect some form of logical consistency from you all on here; I realize that’s a fool’s errand.  It is rather amusing to watch those who claim to be free and critical thinkers all parrot the same bad arguments without evidence simply because they are popular now.  “We believe in science, but men can get pregnant!”

You are free to believe this nonsense. But I'm afraid you are wrong  

Thanks for the reply, and giving it some thought.  How do we know who an actual transwoman is?  I am not sure appealing to past practice is all that morally relevant to this discussion.  

They said thier trans and there a women. That's all we need. 

You believe someone can be trans and then not be trans?  That does not seem to be the position of most trans people in the media. They’re claiming they were assigned the wrong gender at birth.

And this doesn't refute a damn thing  

This isn’t my first rodeo, I know this game you’re trying to play.  You’ll ask for citation after citation and arbitrarily dismiss each one because you do not like what they prove.  It’s an intellectually lazy game that wastes everyone else’s time.  It's interesting that you resort to using a term for a vagina as a means of demeaning someone.  I learned in my unconscious bias training at work that that means you have a prejudice against women or it’s a form of self-loathing if you are a woman.  Attack me all you want, does not offend me.  The fact you have not asked for a citation to support the dozens of assertions made on here by people who you agree with demonstrates you’re not a fair-minded individual and therefore are owed nothing from me.  If you have to play a game with two different sets of rules, then you’re not very good at the game you play 

Excuses, Excuses, Excuses 


So are you now done embarrassing yourself?