Stalter, just because Richard Dawkins said evolution is a complete 100% undeniable fact does not mean everyone who supports it believes the same thing. If someone on here makes a claim that they don't believe it can be known 100% then saying they think it is a reasonable possibility is definitely consistent and logical.
Attacking people for saying that would be like me quoting William Lane Craig and saying "See Christians ultimately would never give up beliefs even in light of contradictory evidence". That is basically in his book called Reasonable Faith just in case you think I am misrepresenting him.
As far as representations of intelligence producing intelligence how does that necessitate a deity who simply speaks things into existence?
Even if we have no representation of intelligence being produced without intelligence we most certainly don't have direct evidence of a supernatural being speaking matter into existence.
That would be impossible to measure scientifically anyway as God is said to be non-physical and undetectable by material means. Perhaps you disagree with that statement and I am curious as to why if you do.
You did mention that you believe creationism is scientific could you be more specific as to how you think it is? I am not trying to be insulting but I am not familiar with all the intricacies of your reasoning so I was hoping you would be willing to clarify.
Attacking people for saying that would be like me quoting William Lane Craig and saying "See Christians ultimately would never give up beliefs even in light of contradictory evidence". That is basically in his book called Reasonable Faith just in case you think I am misrepresenting him.
As far as representations of intelligence producing intelligence how does that necessitate a deity who simply speaks things into existence?
Even if we have no representation of intelligence being produced without intelligence we most certainly don't have direct evidence of a supernatural being speaking matter into existence.
That would be impossible to measure scientifically anyway as God is said to be non-physical and undetectable by material means. Perhaps you disagree with that statement and I am curious as to why if you do.
You did mention that you believe creationism is scientific could you be more specific as to how you think it is? I am not trying to be insulting but I am not familiar with all the intricacies of your reasoning so I was hoping you would be willing to clarify.
