(May 19, 2023 at 8:36 am)FlatAssembler Wrote:BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:Look at Kleck's sample (not the sample size, but who he questioned): he drastically over-represented not just men, but the oldest male in each household with a gun.You can argue that leads to a 30% overestimate, but you can not claim that leads to a 90% overestimate (which would be necessary for guns to kill more people than they save).
THERE IS NO 'ESTIMATE'!! The whole thing is a farce, as I've explained to you before.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax