Quote:You need to understand that all the arguments about empirical matters are to a higher or a lesser degree flawed. Take a look at the Aristotel's arguments for the Earth being round and how Flat-Earthers think they are flawed. Ships disappear bottom first? Maybe that's an illusion caused by waves. Constellations shift as you move north or south? Maybe that's caused by stars being only 3'100 miles up in the sky. The shadow on the Moon during lunar eclipse is round? Maybe that shadow is not the Earth's shadow, but of some other celestial body.What you need to understand is what your saying here is pure absurdity.
You don't get to reject a study just based on its perceived flaws. You need to point to a better study.
And yes I can reject the study as it is garbage. You by contrast can't use it as evidence of anything. Because it isn't.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
