Quote:How is it different? Demanding more rigorous experiments, but never doing ones, is typical of pseudoscience.It's different because one is denialism the other is simply wanting better evidence than a flawed study the fact you would even put them in the same category is ridiculous. Not excepting bad evidence and unrigorous research is not the same as being a denialist. What a stupid comparison.....
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM