(July 6, 2023 at 2:16 am)Helios Wrote:Quote:How is it different? Demanding more rigorous experiments, but never doing ones, is typical of pseudoscience.It's different because one is denialism the other is simply wanting better evidence than a flawed study the fact you would even put them in the same category is ridiculous. Not excepting bad evidence and unrigorous research is not the same as being a denialist. What a stupid comparison.....
All studies are flawed, especially in social sciences. But you go with the best evidence you have.
