ok first of all the point of the vidio is to show 2 scientists who have credable degrees argueing the points of creation vs evolution and if you would watch it you would see that both have a good arguement on their side which means creation does have science on it's side or it wouldn't last a second yet alone an hour in a rational debate. second, yes i know the area seams rather big and it's not just earth in that area but mars as well which is why we think at one point mars had life on it. but you have to factor other things as well like look at how the planets spin. mercury and venus both spin far too slow so their days are far too long so even if they were in the good zone, it wouldn't mean anything cuz it gets far too hot in the day and far too cold at night. large plannets like jupiter and saturn spin faster having days less than half that of earth, but the earth spins at the right speed to make the earth warm enough during the day and not make it too cold at night. and it's "lucky for us" we have iron in the earths magnetic core to create a magnetic field around the earth so it can protect us from most all the solar wind from the sun. it's also lucky we have this form of oxygen called ozone that also protects us from radiation. the point is we have so many systems one built on another and some systems that depend on eachother symultaniously in order to work. and you might claim that there's a slight chance that natural events occured to put the simplist organism together but then how was the information put into the dna that gave it how to do the vital functions to survive? it's like saying a computer was programmed without a programmer. laws of thermodynamics state that things in nature don't get better, they get worse. forces of nature most commonly destroy things and have never been shown to create them. the only things in space that stars can create is space crap, possibly new stars, and black holes. and one more thing, all the mutation we've seen ourselves has been harmful to the organism, so then how is mutation good for developement? some mutation is harmless like having an extra finger or toe or an unusual eye color but others like down syndrome and various other kinds of birth defects are harmful. i challenge anyone to find a mutation that has occured in humans that was benifitial in terms of developement, and survival.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 19, 2025, 7:07 pm
Thread Rating:
Easy arguments against the Bible, and religion as a whole
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)