well according to someone elst on this page who posted a youtube vidio of a scientist talking about the scientific method, the first step is a guess. after that there's experiment, and if the experiment doesn't work, it's wrong. if it does work then it could be right. if a theory can never reach the experiment phase, then all you can do is work out probability. someone could say the moon was made of green cheese, which is rediculous it scientifically can't be proven wrong unless we go there and confirm it's just rocks. when it comes to what's already happened, we can only go by what people have seen and recorded and trust that it's right. beyond that, what humans were unable to record, we can only guess. even if we made an experiment where we created our own mini universe and observed how everything took place and the result was a universe similar to our own, we can't say that's how it happened only that it's most likely. but that would be very convincing evidence. though it can never be scientifically conclusive how the universe came to be without observing it first hand, it can be deturmined what's more probable. based on the evidence i believe it's more probable that the earth was created than it just happened. what i'm trying to do on this page is find out if i'm wrong when someone can come to me with good explinations for these wholes in the theories or really any evidence of experimentation that proved any theory of evelution right other than the one saying it's possible under cirtain atsmopheric conditions for protien units to be created.
and the only way i could further prove it is not based on what happened but what's going to happen looking at cirtain prophicies of the bible but i didn't think that would be a subject ppl here would like to hear.
and the only way i could further prove it is not based on what happened but what's going to happen looking at cirtain prophicies of the bible but i didn't think that would be a subject ppl here would like to hear.
