RE: Noteworthy News
September 11, 2023 at 1:23 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2023 at 1:56 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(September 11, 2023 at 1:12 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:(September 11, 2023 at 8:57 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: The reference to "retail value" will indicate to the astute reader the intent and use of that law.
Which doesn’t alter the fact that copyright infringement is (or at least can be) a criminally prosecutable offense in the US.
Boru
All Trump has to show is that he's politically fundraising, not profiting personally.
ETA: I'm probably wrong about that part. Disregard.
But --
Quote:In general mugshots taken by federal law enforcement agencies(such as federal prisons and the FBI) are in the public domain and are not protected by copyright law. This is because a photo taken by a federal employee as part of their work for the federal government is in the public domain and not protected by copyright law.
However, for mugshots taken by state law enforcement the mugshots may or may not be in the public domain since state, city and other local entities can make their own decisions on whether or not to release mugshots and other photos taken by their employees into the public domain. In addition, some states may chose to restrict access to some mugshots under certain circumstances for reasons unrelated to copyright law.
https://www.newmediarights.org/put_mugsh...l_products
I haven't seen any source state one way or the other whether or not Georgia or Fulton County regards mugshots as public domain, and I'm not so interested as to waste any more time on it.


