"I can only surmise that you have some compelling reason to "know" all of this, and that the countless scientists working in the related fields are just too stupid and/ or ignorant to realize their folly?"
no i don't claim to know more than the scientists. i just claim that they are using bad science to prove a point. macro evolution is almost as bad a science as global warming is.
"Make claims, fail to support those claims, move on to the next talking point. So, you've decided to hop on board with me then? What was impossible or impossibly improbable only a few posts ago is now not so difficult to understand. You've had some misconceptions about probability and the effect of large numbers on any given flip of the coin cleared up for you? Now you're talking about the "miracle of survival". Think I may have mentioned something like that. Nonetheless, survival does not require or invoke any god whatsoever. Large numbers at play again. The majority of these simple lifeforms did not survive. You're objections add nothing to our understanding of the subject, and have already been handled."
what is spiritual is impossible to prove and hard to understand. no i'm not talking about the miricle of survival, i'm talking about the origin of life itself. life needs to be formed before it can survive and there is no good theory that says how it formed itself and stephen hawking himself said scientists aren't exactly sure how life started. but the only theory i've heard (correct me if i'm wrong) is in earth's early atmosphere was composed as such to make it possible that when lightning struck the water it created protien units (amino acids) and these units over time fell into place to make protiens and those eventually fell into place to make the simplist of cells. even the simplist of cells are so complated we cannot reconstruct them using raw materiels. it sounds like a complicated virsion of the spontanious generation theory (that life can form out of things are not alive) which was proved wrong over 150 years ago. they proved life cannot form out of dead meat back then only to have another theory arise that life can form out of raw materials being constructed by forces of nature. which btw is impossible according to the second law of thermodynamics that order cannot be created out of dissorder.
no i don't claim to know more than the scientists. i just claim that they are using bad science to prove a point. macro evolution is almost as bad a science as global warming is.
"Make claims, fail to support those claims, move on to the next talking point. So, you've decided to hop on board with me then? What was impossible or impossibly improbable only a few posts ago is now not so difficult to understand. You've had some misconceptions about probability and the effect of large numbers on any given flip of the coin cleared up for you? Now you're talking about the "miracle of survival". Think I may have mentioned something like that. Nonetheless, survival does not require or invoke any god whatsoever. Large numbers at play again. The majority of these simple lifeforms did not survive. You're objections add nothing to our understanding of the subject, and have already been handled."
what is spiritual is impossible to prove and hard to understand. no i'm not talking about the miricle of survival, i'm talking about the origin of life itself. life needs to be formed before it can survive and there is no good theory that says how it formed itself and stephen hawking himself said scientists aren't exactly sure how life started. but the only theory i've heard (correct me if i'm wrong) is in earth's early atmosphere was composed as such to make it possible that when lightning struck the water it created protien units (amino acids) and these units over time fell into place to make protiens and those eventually fell into place to make the simplist of cells. even the simplist of cells are so complated we cannot reconstruct them using raw materiels. it sounds like a complicated virsion of the spontanious generation theory (that life can form out of things are not alive) which was proved wrong over 150 years ago. they proved life cannot form out of dead meat back then only to have another theory arise that life can form out of raw materials being constructed by forces of nature. which btw is impossible according to the second law of thermodynamics that order cannot be created out of dissorder.
