"Correct, it is very difficult, if not impossible to prove that something that doesn't exist actually does. It isn't hard to understand though. Perhaps it;s giving you trouble, I have no such trouble understanding spiritual concepts or beliefs."
yes b/c u look at them as though they were made up by a bunch of schizophrenics and i look at then as if they're possible. that's the difference.
"Perhaps you should ask a biologist about biology? When your car starts malfunctioning is Stephen Hawking your man, or do you take it in to a mechanic? Nonetheless, the origin of life is a hotly debated subject. That we currently can't say for certain doesn't prevent us from ruling out certain fairy tales. "We don't know" does not default to "goddidit". Our lack of knowledge in any given area is not an open door through which you get to smuggle ghosts and magic. What you're describing is a rough version of one of our theories. I'll link you the wiki at the bottom."
good point perhaps i should quote biologists on matters of biology but anyways the fact that we don't know only proves that it's a matter of faith to believe it happened that way not evidence.
"And? You have billions of years and a lab the size of the earth to try and replicate this "experiment" That's what we're talking about here, never forget it. Are you seriously criticizing a theory based on the fact that we cant make monster hop out of jars of peanut butter?"
nope, just that you call it fact before it's proven
"You've misrepresented what spontaneous regeneration was and why it was incorrect"
i said generation not REgeneration you know, when people thought things like flies are born out of dead meat proven wrong by taking the meat and sealing it away from flies and observing that maggots did not form. an old easy experiment done to prove the theory wrong.
"Are you proposing that life arose of of materials that were/are not present here?"
nope just that they were constructed by a designer. we usually think that those things that look like they were designed are, and that the greater the design the greater the designer. does this not apply to life?
"You need to learn the difference between closed and open systems and how entropy affects them before you go any further with this."
i know the difference but the big question is, is there a way to make an open system into a closed system?
yes b/c u look at them as though they were made up by a bunch of schizophrenics and i look at then as if they're possible. that's the difference.
"Perhaps you should ask a biologist about biology? When your car starts malfunctioning is Stephen Hawking your man, or do you take it in to a mechanic? Nonetheless, the origin of life is a hotly debated subject. That we currently can't say for certain doesn't prevent us from ruling out certain fairy tales. "We don't know" does not default to "goddidit". Our lack of knowledge in any given area is not an open door through which you get to smuggle ghosts and magic. What you're describing is a rough version of one of our theories. I'll link you the wiki at the bottom."
good point perhaps i should quote biologists on matters of biology but anyways the fact that we don't know only proves that it's a matter of faith to believe it happened that way not evidence.
"And? You have billions of years and a lab the size of the earth to try and replicate this "experiment" That's what we're talking about here, never forget it. Are you seriously criticizing a theory based on the fact that we cant make monster hop out of jars of peanut butter?"
nope, just that you call it fact before it's proven
"You've misrepresented what spontaneous regeneration was and why it was incorrect"
i said generation not REgeneration you know, when people thought things like flies are born out of dead meat proven wrong by taking the meat and sealing it away from flies and observing that maggots did not form. an old easy experiment done to prove the theory wrong.
"Are you proposing that life arose of of materials that were/are not present here?"
nope just that they were constructed by a designer. we usually think that those things that look like they were designed are, and that the greater the design the greater the designer. does this not apply to life?
"You need to learn the difference between closed and open systems and how entropy affects them before you go any further with this."
i know the difference but the big question is, is there a way to make an open system into a closed system?
