(November 8, 2023 at 6:50 am)Deesse23 Wrote:(November 8, 2023 at 4:30 am)FrustratedFool Wrote: The usual response to the Euthyphro dilemma is for the xtian apologist to argue that God's nature is necessary (thus not arbitrary) and His commands flow from that nature (which is morally perfect). This nature establishes the moral realism layer of reality and is thus objective for all created beings.Unfortunatley its an unfounded assertion each time the apologist pulls this out of his southern end. There is no reason God has to be "good" in any way.
I guess that depends upon whether you believe necessities make sense.
I don't know, but I tend towards thinking that they don't and that if God existed He would be a brute fact. Thus His nature would be too.
