I concur entirely.
That's who they are. I wouldn't care about my hypothetical child's gender and I have no idea why I should about their sexuality either! (Well, obviously it seems to me, I shouldn't! I can see no moral justification for such biased prejudice as for my views to be otherwise on this matter!).
It is not that I would have to 'tolerate' a gay child - because I don't see why there's anything to have to tolerate! Why would (or should(?)) straight be 'better'(?). Both are just who the hypothetical child is!
To me, it makes no difference at all - I'd obviously love them the same; and from my own personal perspective, in a moral sense - that's obvious. It really should go without saying. Shame it doesn't...hopefully by 3009 it will...!(?)
EvF
That's who they are. I wouldn't care about my hypothetical child's gender and I have no idea why I should about their sexuality either! (Well, obviously it seems to me, I shouldn't! I can see no moral justification for such biased prejudice as for my views to be otherwise on this matter!).
It is not that I would have to 'tolerate' a gay child - because I don't see why there's anything to have to tolerate! Why would (or should(?)) straight be 'better'(?). Both are just who the hypothetical child is!
To me, it makes no difference at all - I'd obviously love them the same; and from my own personal perspective, in a moral sense - that's obvious. It really should go without saying. Shame it doesn't...hopefully by 3009 it will...!(?)
EvF