Why Agnostic?

[Purple Rabbit]

Exactly. Granted, under the true definition of agnosticism, everyone really is agnostic. But the term is used for claims. As in, someone can claim gnosticism about a subject, although I think it's intellectual dishonest. I don't think gnosticism, especially about the divine, is possible, especially when they can be millions of interpretations. (And sorry for the delayed response, there's a pesky 4th of July Holiday in my country, and I've been busy. )

There's someting assymetrical about the attempt to make a precise definition of atheism that works for all god concepts while theism is like rubber. It bends, it moves, it transforms itself lurking for the holes of our understanding of nature. Why are we going through the trouble?