(July 5, 2009 at 3:07 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(July 5, 2009 at 10:54 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: Dawkin's scale still makes vastly more sense to me.Apart from the fact that he uses a faulty definition of agnosticism. You opposed the certainty factor in my scale, yet if you read Dawkins' scale carefully you will see that it is nothing but views on certainty.
I don't think his definition of agnostic is wrong and I still think his scale makes more sense than yours ... I'm not going to apologise for the fact that I think Dawkins is more correct on this than you.
(July 5, 2009 at 3:07 pm)Tiberius Wrote: I don't think "agnostic atheist" is a wishy-washy title if you actually understand what the words mean (and the notes are there to explain). Far from being wishy-washy, it explains more about your view than a simple "atheist" title does. I think being agnostic about your atheism makes you a more intellectually fulfilled atheist.
I do. I disagree. I disagree
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator