(April 19, 2025 at 3:20 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: For my answer to the last question, go to about 20:19 in this video.
Frankly, if we gave someone as Ernst Kaltenbrunner due process to actually examine the evidence of his crimes against humanity, there’s ZERO good reason to deny it to a potential grunt in a foreign gang.
I’m seriously considering codifying something I’d call a “Nuremberg Defendant” rule (something I first thought of in the aftermath of the Shari Franke case). If your idea of punishment involves deliberately denying someone long-term something that even the defendants at Nuremberg were allowed to have (whether it’s due process or a fucking bed), you’re probably the worse party in this scenario.
Couldn't agree more. This is what happens whenever and wherever you have a government that views legality as an obstruction rather than an objective.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
